What Were The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt Used For?
more one reads on this topic, the more peculiar it gets. There is
not only a lack of consensus, but also no internal logical consistency
within the various opinions. The 19th century tomb theory retains
no credibility as to the initial reason for their being built; although
such ancient Egyptian structures were later appropriated in some
cases for this usage. This shows just how mysterious and likely
hidden their initial function must have been. But for this philosopher
it is astonishing that almost nobody has even considered the possibility
that the pyramids were simply designed to trap lightning as a power
idea of ancient Egyptians using electricity is so widespread that
I could not ascertain who came up with it first. The depiction (image
2) of how this may have looked is on so many websites that I do
not know to whom the image must be credited. And the photo (image
1) is well known to be authentic from the Temple of Dendara.
I have not figured out just what type of battery they may have used,
and what type of device may optimally be charged by a lightning
strike. It being inductively clear that something must be able to
retain a miniscule part of the charge of a lightning bolt. The shafts
after all contain copper 'handles', or the remains of something
larger. Obviously the vast bulk of a pyramid can endure numerous
strikes, and their large size also attracts lightning more effectively
than any other shape.
The Great Pyramid was certainly not designed to be a tomb. The most glaring proof being that having crawled into the recesses of the Great Pyramid personally I can attest to not a single hieroglyph anywhere inside it at all. Numerous other studies concur that the dynastic Egyptians discovered these incredible artifacts and took possession of them millennia after their initial construction.
However, those stuck in dogmatic institutions still believe that the pyramids were tombs. Academics, of course, are hardly allowed to say anything other than to bleat the corporate mantra, no matter how out-dated it may be. Their funding and social status depends on it. As does the profits from the sale of textbooks and other media. This is how elitist structures perpetuate their political and social power, by rewarding only those who blindly follow their dogma, and thus eliminating enlightened competition. Its a very old story not only originating with the Pharaohs, but also epitomized by the narratives of the 'Emperor's New Clothes', and 'Animal Farm'. The psychology of how scientific knowledge progresses and regresses is foundational to understanding scientific knowledge itself. Ethics is a priori to science.
Fascism, nazism, and apartheid being recent examples of how pervasive it is to capture a state or institution using fear and ignorance as control mechanisms. Having grown up under apartheid it was vivid to me how they controlled people by insisting on miniscule obedience to petty commands and unimportant untruths, and thereby laying the foundation for total control of the minds of an entire nation. Once they have you accepting the seemingly unimportant untruths, they just increment the lie little by little, until you are their slave.
Only by risking everything to resist every command and untruth no matter how trivial, were the shackles of the mind finally broken. And to this day, more than a quarter of a century later, those racists still take every chance to slander me for destroying their evil government. They go so far out of their way to get at me, that I feel immense satisfaction knowing how crucial my resistance must have been to destroying that mob-mentality. This war will never end; it is a global struggle now.
Most universities all over the world nowadays have taken the mob-mentality of 'white-monopoly-capital' to ever more precarious states of brain-washing. Corporate society is attempting to move away from freedom of information, and it perpetuates the regressive idea that the laws of nature can be owned and controlled by elitist 'professional experts', heaping scorn and slanderous labels such as 'conspiracy theorist' upon any who disagree.
This is their primary mode of persuasion; a belittling emotional argument, not a logical or empirical one. Thus humanity becomes intellectually stagnant at best, living on the reputation, laurels, and the science of previous generations, all the while crumbling inside from the lack of ethics within. Do not let the advances in technology mislead you into thinking our understanding of natural laws has improved. The wonder of the internet and other modern marvels are still based primarily on physics models from the 19th century and earlier. Most recent theory for the last 100 years is sheer sophistry. The rot starts with Einstein (but that is another article).
This is how all mighty empires that ever existed, have eventually destroyed themselves. If such a psychological narrative of elitism is untrue, then we'd all still be using hieroglyphics today whilst entombing our Pharaohs in pyramids designed for an entirely different, but practical purpose. Ask yourself, how could the greatest builders ever, have simply lost power? Because their hypocrisy and myopic personal material interests were seen as more important than truth for the sake of truth. This degenerative mindset killed the Czars, the French monarchy, the Romans and the ancient Greeks as well.
Its ironic how atheist academia and other dogmatic institutions prefer to perpetuate the idea of these magnificent constructs being designed for archaic religious purposes. Whereas spiritual people seem to see the most majestic artifacts ever built, as having initially had some or other practical use. Think deeply about that one.
this conclusion: that the pyramids were simply designed to charge
primitive batteries, was not arrived at whilst primarily studying
pyramids. Instead it was realized by trying to figure out a way
to construct a lightning trap. The first step is to build a structure
that is most effective at attracting lightning - which intuitively
seemed to be a pyramid. Then I read Miles Mathis' great article.
To be fair he seems to allude to this conclusion, but then typically
gets so caught up in the detail as to how lightning works that he
does not quite complete his thought process. (Or perhaps he leaves
it to someone else more daring to share in the flack and ridicule
bestowed by the Emperor's mob).
why are the pyramids so perfectly aligned to North? It is certain
that they also had the dual purpose of predicting the seasons, and
thus when it was optimal to plant crops. The shadow splits the edge
of the pyramid precisely at the equinox. Here it becomes clear that
the Great Pyramid actually has an indent, and is eight-sided. This
feature would cement the position of the ruling elite. So sure,
the Great Pyramid was a calendar too.
If you are interested in the age of the pyramids, a good source is Brien Foerster, who estimates them to have originated before the cataclysmic deluge of 9600 BC. This is an increasingly accepted perspective from 21st century online sources and by those with tech-savvy. The 'Ancient Architects channel' gives excellent proof of Giza constructions predating the dynastic Egyptians in a top-rate video (see references at bottom for details).
Of course archaic academia still accepts the 19th century opinion that the Great Pyramid was built by the dynastic Egyptians, much more recently in about 2500 BC. This has certainly been debunked by Brien Foerster and numerous other online sources. But this is not really the focus here, although I have looked at this extensively.
Brien Foerster must be commended for excellent methodology, considering all perspectives. Not that he is infallible. He seems to suggest the cataclysm from 12000 years ago shifted the Earth's axis. This would mean that the pyramids are more recent than this, because they are aligned to what would then be considered the post-cataclysmic axis of the Earth. So there is some logical inconsistency in his ideas.
If the pyramids were built before the alleged shifting of the Earth's axis by 23 degrees, then they would not be aligned like they are. Nevertheless he makes so many good observations and analyses that he certainly can be forgiven this one error. But of course shifting the axis of the Earth by 23 degrees would wipe out all major life forms, not just civilizations. Nobody has properly dated the pyramids because they are made of rock, not organic material. The date of 2500 BC is based on the age of the organic materials in the hieroglyphics. The Great Pyramid has no hieroglyphs at all.
A short point on the Orion idea from Graeme Hancock, is simply this: The smallest pyramid is not large enough to fit the 3rd star as a depiction of Orion's belt. Also the three smaller pyramids are in the wrong positions to represent the three stars in the sword of Orion. Its seems wrong to align the larger three, and then simply place the smaller three in a neat row for no clear reason. As for whether the shafts do line up to Sirius, etc, I cannot tell, though I have seen claims to suggest that they do and do not.
Matt Sibson of the youtube channel 'Ancient Architects' claims that organic samples from within the seamless cracks between the stones date to 3100 BC. But consider the next two images. Image 7 shows that two of the 'shafts' do not reach the outer edge, strangely. Image 8 shows that the entrance itself does not reach the outer edge.
The only logical deduction is that the outer part of the pyramid
was added after the initial design. So there are at least 3 phases
here: The original pyramid; the outer shell construct; and then
the much later time of the dynastic Egyptians. So which part of
the pyramid exactly the organic material dating to 3100 BC was obtained,
is not evident. Such evidence is entirely circumstantial, and cannot
be proof. The pyramid was stripped of its casing many centuries
ago, and it certainly has been built on to at least once. And how
many other times has it been fiddled with that we do not know of,
Jonathan Ainsley Bain - 26 October - 2018 A.D.
the homepage of
visit in Winter 2001
Brief References for this page
Regret that the links cannot simply be clicked as such links often go dead,
thus requiring far too much vigilant maintenance, and I want to ensure this website stays error free.
Highlight the address then copy it into the address bar on your browser to access these web-pages.