A
list and summary of the various scenarios:

**[1]** The simplest example
of how the gravity wave-form of the orbits results from a binary pair.
Near-circular orbital-shapes with equal masses generate a regular
curve.

**[2]** This demonstrates
the problem: Binary-Orbit, Gravity-Velocity, Out-Spiral (BOGVOS).

**[3]** This scenario shows
the LIGO wave-form estimated as the best computation within the theoretical
framework from Abbott and the LIGO scientists. The expected wave-form
is not the result. The limit of the velocity of light from Special
Relativity causes the pair to drift back and forth once after 30 orbits.
This is reflected in the observed gravity wave-form. To see the smaller
wave-form of the orbits: Start the scenario; then pause it. Click
‘Fine Tuning’ and change the ‘Stiffness’ variable
from 0.8 to 0.9999. Un-pause to continue the scenario.

**[4]** Binary pair with
unequal mass and uniform orbits. There is no in-spiral or merger in
a purely Newtonian paradigm. The wave-form oscillates evenly with
the circular orbits in Newtonian physics even when the pair has unequal
masses.

**[5]** Instead of in-spiral
from Special Relativity, it is possible that the in-spiral could occur
due to collisions with a cloud of matter. This shows that the in-spiral
results in a decrease in amplitude.

**[6]** The gravity wave-form
of the orbit with a pair of equal mass merging. With an in-spiral
caused by a cloud of matter, this scenario fails to show an increase
in amplitude of the wave-form due to the contact and merging process.

**[7]** This option is a
preliminary intuition which served two purposes. Firstly it is a test
case to ensure that the angle of incidence is correct when the pair
collide with a glancing blow. Secondly it was an intuition that the
wave-form may have occurred due to the pair enduring a series of glancing
blows before they merge. This did not quite give the correct wave-form,
but it was a close guess.

**[8]** Unequal mass and
horizontal eccentric orbits according to the Newtonian paradigm.

**[9] **Unequal mass and
vertical eccentric orbits according to the Newtonian paradigm.

**[10]** Vertical eccentric
orbits with equal masses according to the Newtonian paradigm.

**[11]** Horizontal eccentric
orbits with equal mass according to the Newtonian paradigm.

**[12]** Tests how the spin
affects the orbit at collision.

**[13]** Newtonian scaling
test. Distance of 350km yields 75Hz for combined 66 solar masses.
OGS11 is in agreement with the Newtonian estimates of the LIGO group.

**[14]** Sum Theory demonstrates
that mass is lost when the edges of the bodies approach the velocity
of light. Velocity turns into spin as an object approaches the velocity
of light.

**[15]** Observe how the
limit of velocity at the velocity of light results in the in-spiral.
Just the orbit-lines are here depicted (see ‘Horizon’
option). The closer to circular the orbits are, the less in-spiral
occurs. Compare this scenario with scenario [4] by enabling ‘Limit
Velocity < C’ in that scenario to see comparatively almost
no in-spiral.

**[16]** If gravity propagates
at the velocity of light, the pair spiral outwards. This also includes
the much smaller spiral inwards from the limit on velocity from Special
Relativity, as well as the in-spiral from the cloud of dark matter.
The result is still an outward spiral.

**[17]** Gravity is at the
velocity of light from General Relativity. A loss in velocity from
Special Relativity tries to cause an in-spiral. Momentum is much less
to try and cause an in-spiral, but they still out-spiral.

**[18]** With the pair starting
at a large distance apart, and the in-spiral caused by a cloud of
dark matter.

**[19] **Binary pair with
unequal mass - at large distance. Gravity delay and limit as object
approaches the velocity of light included (General and Special Relativity).

**[20]** With the pair about
600km apart and gravity propagated at 6x the velocity of light there
is still no equilibrium between in-spiral and out-spiral. Decrease
the velocity of gravity to increase the outwards spiral. Take special
note of the ‘timer delay’. If this number gets too low
(less than 3) then the computer speed causes a large rounding-off
error. This can only be improved upon with a faster computer process.
But it does not affect the principle of the matter.

**[21] **This uses the Special
Relativity velocity limit for the pair at the velocity of light but
now starts the algorithm with the pair over 2300km apart. Even with
gravity propagated at 50 times the velocity of light, the outwards
spiral is still more than the in-spiral from the limit at the velocity
of light.

**[22]** At a distance of
over 5750 km between the pair, if the velocity of gravity is about
99 times the velocity of light, there is still out-spiral. If the
velocity for gravity is higher than this, the timer delay goes beyond
the margin of error at this scale.

**[23]** A binary pair of
white dwarfs; each the mass of just 1 sun. (NOT super-dense ‘black
holes’). Less mass requires less velocity, the result is that
they are larger and orbit more slowly than the ‘black holes’.
This example is Newtonian.

**[24]** A binary pair of
white dwarfs; each the mass of just 1 sun. With in-spiral from Special
Relativity, and velocity of gravity from General Relativity the pair
spiral away from each other at an ever increasing rate. They start
about 2450km apart here.

**[25]** This is the same
as the scenario [24], except that the starting momentum is less in
order to try and get the pair to in-spiral. Either way, they out-spiral
due to the delay in gravity.

**[26]** Close non-binary
orbit. Observe how Einstein's limit at the velocity of light affects
the shape of the eccentric orbit of the smaller body. This represents
possibly the most fascinating result. This is not at all in-keeping
with claims of how the orbit of Mercury is supposed to advance. Mercury
should actually be spiraling into the Sun if Einstein’s limit
on the velocity of light is valid. A loss in velocity must surely
cause an in-spiral.

**[27]** Seeing as though
there is no known physics that results in the energy of the system
increasing both the amplitude and the frequency of the signal, and
gravity must be instantaneous; the only conclusion is that the wave-form
is an artificial electromagnetic construct. Read more about this vital
intrigue at the end of the chapter.

.