the idea that giving the photon zero mass can save Relativity
from failing is incorrect for a much simpler reason: If a photon
departs my nose at the velocity of light, and all velocity is
relative, then my nose is moving away from the photon at the
velocity of light (Special Relativity). This means that my nose
has infinite mass relative to the photon (think about it).
makes my nose a black-hole relative to the photon. So the photon
could not depart the black-hole of my nose. It would be sucked
right in. All objects should be black-holes from the relative
velocity of photons – and this is also true for gravitons!
The concepts of relative motion (and also Relativity as a whole)
break down completely for objects at the velocity of light.
an object at the relative velocity of light emitted a graviton
then that object would have infinite mass relative to the graviton.
This would curve space to such a severe degree that the graviton
would not be able to escape the object.
trying to calculate most of the principles of Relativity with
computational precision, these and other endless problems arise.
Each time I reread this, I think of more contradictions all
of which are solved with Sum Theory.
have documented about 20 separate contradictions in this chapter,
about 20 in the last chapter, and I have roughly jotted down
about a dozen more, and ignored another dozen or so for the
sake of brevity. I’m sure that you could easily find a
few more such contradictions if you put your mind to it.
can you resolve the contradictions?